|
CAC远景战略框架
|
||
|
食品法典委员会将通过制定以科学原则为基础的,实现消费者健康保护和公平食品贸易为目标的国际商定的标准和有关文本,供国内管理和国际食品贸易使用,促进为人人实现最大程度的消费者保护,包括食品安全。 序
言 1.
本文件陈述了食品法典委员会(食典委)的战略重点,为详细制定2003—2007年中期计划奠定了基础。食典委的战略远景和目标支持其上级组织即粮农组织和世卫组织对食品安全给予十分优先的重视。粮农组织2000—2015年战略框架对促进国际和国家两级的食品政策和管理框架给予高度优先重视。同样,世界卫生大会第五十三届会议认为必须在国际食品贸易中强调对健康的考虑,并承认食典委对确保最大程度的消费者健康保护的重要性。该决议还促请世卫组织努力将食品安全作为其基本的公共保健职能之一,与发展可持续的一体化食品安全系统,减少整个食物链中的健康风险的目标相结合。食典委的基本任务是为消费者健康保护和公平食品贸易方法制定国际标准和规范。 2.
食典委始终在变化和技术进步的环境中运作。世界食品贸易的发展、现代通讯技术的进步以及人口流动性增加,都促使食品安全和管理的能见度和重要性提高。国际社会日益关注预见的食物携带疾病的紧急情况/增加。世界各地消费者的食品安全意识比以往任何时候更加强烈,并正为其所食用的食物争取更大的安全和质量保障。革新和新工艺(包括现代生物技术)的发展,正在导致开发具有特定医疗、营养和功能特性的新产品。另一项发展变化是对有机食物的关注不断增加,有机食物可能占有未来国际市场的重大份额。同样可能的是发展中国家占全球食品和农产品贸易的比例将提高。这些发展变化虽然令人感到兴奋,但也对食典委和国家政策提出了新的挑战(既有食品安全方面的也有非食品安全的挑战)。 3.
食品标准、准则和其它建议在世贸组织关于应用卫生和植物检疫措施协定(植检协定)中得到新的承认和地位,也带来了新的挑战和责任,包括需要确保其标准和有关文本以科学原则为基础,满足该组织的需要和任务。世贸组织贸易技术壁垒协定也具有极大的相关性。因为同产品说明、标识、包装和质量描述符有关的条款对消费者知情和公平贸易方法具有重要性。虽然质量条款根本上以市场为动力,但在确保与质量有关的条款的合理性,不仅以本质性标准为基础,而且不构成经过伪装的贸易壁垒方面,食典委具有重要的作用。 4.
这些发展变化使人们再度对食典委的工作产生了兴趣,并导致该组织的成员大量增加。发展中国家现占全体成员的多数。鉴于世贸组织对国际协调给予的重视,现食典委及其成员更加需要确保该组织保持其作为国际认可的食品标准机构的显要地位,而且所有成员尽可能广泛地运用其规范,作为国内管理和国际贸易的基础。 科学决策责任 5.
食典委决策的科学基础,在《关于科学在食典决策过程中的作用及在何等程度上考虑其它因素的原则声明》1中已予详细说明。食典委本身并不进行科学评价,而是依靠粮农组织和世卫组织就具体问题组织的科学专家委员会或磋商会的意见。这些专家机构如粮农组织/世卫组织食品添加剂联合专家委员会、粮农组织/世卫组织农药残留物联合会议和粮农组织/世界卫生组织联合微生物危险性评估专家会议等独立于食典委及其下属机构,不属于本战略框架的范围。这些机构的任务、职能、构成和议程由粮农组织和世卫组织确定。虽然专家机构的独立性对其意见的客观性至关重要,但这些机构的会议通常考虑到食典委章程第1条所指的食典委的建议。粮农组织和世卫组织科学专家小组和食典委的政府间机构之间具有重大的协同作用。 战略目标和重点 6.食品法典委员会的根本目标是,以消费者健康保护和公平贸易的标准为基础,考虑到所有各国的需要和特殊关注,为国家食品管理系统制定合理的国际商定一致的准则。下列所有目标被认为对全面实现战略远景具有同等重要性。 目标1:促进合理的管理框架 7.
在许多国家中,立法零散、多元管辖以及监视、监测和执法工作薄弱,削弱了有效的食品管理。合理的国家食品控制和管理系统对确保国内人口的健康和安全,确保进入国际贸易的食品的安全和质量至关重要。虽然建立管理系统根本上是国家的一项责任,但食典委及其上级机构即粮农组织和世卫组织十分关心促进以国际原则和准则为基础,涉及食物链所有组成部分的国家管理系统。发展健全的食品控制和管理基础设施,对发展中国家努力提高其食品安全和营养程度特别重要,如1999年召开的“关于2000年以后的国际食品贸易的墨尔本会议的报告”所强调的那样,需要高层次政治和政策承诺。有效的食品控制系统对使所有国家能够确保其进入国际贸易的食品的安全,确保进口食品符合国家要求十分关键。成功谈妥双边相互承认和/或等同,也取决于各国保证各自国家管理系统的完整性的能力。 8.
食典委在制定国际标准和有关文本方面的重点将是:
·
促进发展以国际原则和标准为基础的国家食品控制系统,以减少整个食物链中的健康危险性; ·
通过不断发展与食品安全和卫生、营养、标识和进口/出口检查验证系统为各成员国提供必要的指导,并为实际应用等同和相互承认的概念提供指导。 ·
促进发展以国际原则和标准为基础的国家食品控制系统,以减少整个食物链中的健康危险性; 目标2:促进广泛地一致应用科学原则和危险性分析 9.食典委将通过最广泛地应用以食典原则为基础的危险性分析,促进和进一步加强将健康考虑纳入其标准和准则的能力。应用于食品的危险性分析是一门新兴的学科,将需要委员会、其上级组织和国家政府不断提供投入,促进国际和国家两级的概念发展和应用。危险性情况交流对这个过程至关重要。委员会和各成员国政府及早实施食典委危险性分析行动计划对以下活动至关重要: ·
促进在食典系统的所有工作中一致应用危险性分析原则; ·
加强国际危险性评估能力,包括与微生物危害和处理新的病原体有关的危险性评估的国际能力; ·
通过确定对象的技术援助和合作,提高国家一级尤其是发展中国家对危险性分析概念、原则及其应用的认识; ·
促进增加整个危险性分析过程的透明度; ·
加强对于在危险性分析过程中如何考虑预防及科学不确定性的了解; ·
加强危险性交流; ·
促进从发展中国家和世界所有区域收集数据,使危险性分析以全球状况和需要为基础。 10.
食典委还将需要高度优先重视不断发展各种概念和原则,为在国际和国家两级应用危险性分析方法制定合理的工作原则。食典委还应当通过技术援助计划促进提高对危险性分析的认识。加强处理化学、微生物学危害和新的病原体的专家科学评价结构,对支持和奠定食典标准制定过程也至关重要。 11.
与1995年食典委所通过的原则声明一致,委员会将需要在制定标准和准则时,酌情充分重视与保护消费者健康有关的其它合法因素及促进公平食品贸易。就食典委决策过程中其它合法因素的范围和应用取得国际共识,对在整个食典系统中合理而一致地应用这些因素十分重要。这方面的一项重要目标是促进提高整个危险性分析过程的透明度,以便加深理解如何在危险性分析过程考虑到预防措施和科学不肯定性。 目标3:促进食典委与其它多学科管理文书和公约之间的无缝连接界面 12.
食典委没有也不可能孤立运作。它需要与确定标准的其它有关国际管理机构紧密配合,促进就共同感兴趣的事项进行密切合作和对话。作为得到世贸组织承认的确定食品安全标准的国际机构,委员会有明确的义务为保护消费者健康和确保公平的食品贸易方法制定国际食品标准,这些标准可为成员国在国内管理及国际贸易中加以应用。与此同时,委员会需要与有关国际机构密切交流,充分考虑到国际管理行动和发展变化。确保其产生与有关国际公约和协定保持一致。此类合作对尽量减少重复劳动也具有重要性。食品安全和食品问题如生物技术也具有全球性利益,
已成为一些多边机构的辩论和讨论的主题。鉴于在国际食品标准方面的主导作用,食典委在与有关多边机构和公约(兽疫局、世贸组织、经合发组织、生物多样性公约/生物安全议定书、联合国欧洲经济委员会、国际植保公约等)密切合作方面具有战略利益,以提供技术投入和专业知识,促进就当代的食品标准和管理政策事项达成国际共识。 目标4:加强对食品部门的新问题,关注和变化作出有效、迅速反应的能力 13.
随着技术的迅速发展和食品安全成为公共政策的一个主要事项,必须加强食典委满足成员国需要的能力,其方式应能维持对其作为国际食品标准组织的能力的信心。这方面有一些重要的问题需要加以考虑。食典委的一个主要问题是其制定标准所需的时间长短问题。食典制定过程往往太长,不能满足当前的期望和公共政策需要。全世界各国政府必须努力完成重大的管理任务,而食典委作为确定食品标准的全球性机构,需要能够通过找到解决食品安全和国际贸易事项的国际协调一致的方法,作出有效而迅速的反应。重新重视委员会及其下属 机构取得结果的方式必然成为一项战略重点。重点重新调整后的委员会的关键职能将是: ·
对所有下属机构的工作计划进行战略性监督、指导和跨部门协调; ·
按照规定时限开展新的工作和通过标准及有关条文; ·
为更加广泛地辩论和讨论当前的食品安全和管理政策问题提供论坛; ·
促进以共识为基础的决策。 14.
在下属机构一级,实现重大改进的方法可能是制定有时间限制的程序,回顾当前的步骤,使商品和综合主题委员会及特设工作组能够按照食典委下放的权力范围在制定阶段(第3步和第5步)加快标准的制定。及时制定标准还将需要改进商品及综合主题委员会会议的时间与频率的协调。 15.
正如序言部分指出的那样,委员会的上级机构高度优先重视食品安全和国际标准计划。东道国政府也提供了大量的的财政支持。然而,食典委履行其使命和满足其成员日益增加的需要和期望的能力,最终将取决于能否得到额外的资源。食典委的会议及有关活动的工作量已经很大,进一步加强工作将需要额外的财力和人力资源。 目标5:
促进尽量增加成员和参与 16.
目前,所有食典委成员及其它有关各方充分参与食典委及其下属机构的工作比以往任何时候更加重要。所有成员及有关政府间和非政府组织的参与,对合理决策和确保食典标准及有关条文考虑到全面的利益和观点至关重要。自90年代初以来,食典委成员大量增加,发展中国家现占全体成员的比例相当大。尽管成员数量增加,但许多国家仍然面临严重的财力和人力资源限制,难以有效地参与食典委的活动。实现尽量扩大参与的目标将需要为解决以下问题开展具体而持续的行动: ·
资源限制一需要及早采取行动,促进发展中国家有效参与食典标准制定活 动,包括可能时利用预算外资源提供财政援助; ·
能力建设一仍然需要在旨在加强国家食品法典管理和磋商机构(如食典联络点和国家法典委员会)的能力建设计划方面,尤其是在发展中国家进行投资,并为加强国家的技术分析能力和所有有关团体参与国际标准制定活动提供资金。这将需要双边或多边技术援助。 17.
除了促进成员国参与的行动之外,食典委还需要继续努力,促进和便利消费者和公共利益团体参与其国际和一级的进程及鼓励政府在国家两一级的进程采取行动。鉴于公众对食品安全和管理问题十分关注,消费者和非政府团体的参与和投入,对增强公众对国际标准的信心并确保公众为食典标准、准则和建议提供大量投入,接受和支持这些标准、准则和建议作为国内管理和贸易的基础至关重要。 目标6:促进尽可能应用食典标准 18.
作为确定国际食品标准的重要机构,食典委在促进为国内管理和国际贸易尽可能使用其标准方面具有明确的战略意义。以食典标准、准则和建议为基础进行国际协调,对促进全球性消费者保护方针(包括减少食物携带危险的系统)和尽可能减少技术条例对国际贸易的不利影响十分重要。这将需要为以下主要活动作出持续的承诺和努力: ·
为食典委决策提供了重要标准的《关于科学在食典决策过程中的作用及考虑其它因素的程度的原则声明》3,将需要所有国家予以大力支持和作出承诺,才能使这些声明在国家和国际两级实际生效; ·
食典委必须象委员会危险性分析行动计划4所设想的那样,在其工作过程中继续促进一致应用合理的科学和危险性分析原则; ·
食典制定过程必须包含各种意见和透明,使国家和国际一级所有有关团体都能参与和提供投入。鉴于食典委成员对确保食典制定过程充分考虑到科学不肯定性和预防要素的兴趣和关注,这一点特别重要。危险性评估和决策标准及过程的透明度对实现这项目标至关重要: ·
委员会必须完成1991年粮农组织/世卫组织国际食品标准、食物中的化学物和食品贸易会议首次提出的战略重点转移,转向以业绩为基础的标准和准则,在一系列商品中加以广泛应用,并注重对消费者健康保护和促进公平贸易至关重要的条款; ·
食典委必须确保其标准和准则反映发展中世界的需要和特殊关注,但又不损害消费者的健康; ·
食典委的决定应当尽最大可能以协商一致为基础。
·
食典委认到食品安全标准不能折中,在制定并决定食典标准个任何有关文本时应考虑到发展中国家的特殊需要,包括基础设施、资源、技术和法律能力; ·
应认真制定食品质量和安全食典标准,包括标签方面,以确保这些标准不会过于严格。 实现战略远景和目标 19.本文件所描述的战略目标将需要一项行动计划和实施战略。这些事项将在2003—2007年中期计划框架内加以处理。 1
食品法典委员会程序手册第11段第180页 2
2000年以后的国际食品贸易会议:以科学为依据的决定、协调一致、等同和相互承认(1999年10月11—15日,澳大利亚墨尔本),报告附录1第29段。 3
食品法典委员会程序手册第11版,第180页。 4
食品法典委员会第二十三届会议(1999拿月28日至7月3日,罗马)报告,第10-11页。 [1] 该文件由第24次CAC大会审议通过,作为CAC今后工作的行动纲领。
STRATEGIC
FRAMEWORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STRATEGIC VISION STATEMENTThe Codex Alimentarius Commission envisages a world afforded the highest attainable levels of consumer protection, including food safety and quality. To this end, the Commission will develop internationally agreed standards and related texts for use in domestic regulation and international trade in food that are based on scientific principles and fulfil the objectives of consumer health protection and fair practices in food trade. INTRODUCTION1. This document sets out the strategic priorities for the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) and provides the basis for the elaboration of the Medium Term Plan for the period 2003-2007. The strategic vision and goals for Codex underpin the high priority attached to food safety by its parent organizations, the FAO and the WHO. The FAO Strategic framework for 2000-2015 accords high priority to promoting policy and regulatory frameworks for food at the international and national levels. Similarly the 53rd Session of the World Health Assembly recognized the need to highlight health considerations in international food trade and acknowledged the importance of the CAC for assuring the highest levels of consumer health protection. The resolution also urged WHO to work towards integrating food safety as one of its essential public health functions with the goal of developing sustainable, integrated food safety systems for the reduction of health risk along the entire food chain. The fundamental mandate of the CAC is to develop international standards and norms for consumer health protection and fair practices in the food trade. 2. The CAC has always operated in an environment of change and technological advancement. The growth in world food trade, advances in modern communication and increasing mobility of populations are all contributing to elevating the profile and significance of food safety and regulation. There is growing international concern related to a perceived emergence/increase in food-borne diseases. Consumers around the world are becoming more aware than ever about food safety issues and are seeking ever-greater assurances about the safety and quality of foods they eat. Innovation and the development of new processes (including modern biotechnology) are leading to the development of new products with specific medical, nutritional and functional attributes. In its endeavour to promote food safety and quality, the CAC needs to consider opportunities for strengthening partnerships with all stakeholders, in particular consumers and their representative organizations, at the global and national levels. A further development is the growing interest in organic foods, which are likely to capture a significant share of the international market in the future. It is also likely that developing countries will account for an increasing proportion of global food and agricultural trade. These developments, while exciting, also present new challenges (both safety and non safety) for the CAC and national governments. 3. The new recognition and status that Codex standards, guidelines and other recommendations acquired under the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (the SPS Agreement) also brought new challenges and responsibilities including the need to ensure that its standards and related texts are based on scientific principles and meet the needs and mandate of the organization. The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade is also of great relevance given the significance of the provisions pertaining to product description, labelling, packaging and quality descriptors for consumer information and fair practices in trade. Although quality provisions are fundamentally driven by the market, the CAC has an important role in ensuring that provisions relating to quality are sound and based on the criteria of essentiality and do not constitute disguised barriers to trade. 4. These developments have generated renewed interest in the work of the CAC and have resulted in a substantial growth in membership of the organization with developing countries now accounting for a majority of total membership. Given the importance that the WTO attaches to international harmonization, there is now an even greater imperative for CAC and its members to ensure that the Organization maintains its pre-eminent status as the internationally recognized body for food standards and its norms are applied to the widest extent possible by all members as a basis for domestic regulation and international trade. DECISION-MAKING BASED ON SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE1. The scientific basis of decision-making by the CAC is spelt out in the Statements of Principle on the Role of Science in the Codex Decision-Making and the Extent to which Other Factors are Taken into Account [ Codex Alimentarius Commission, Procedural Manual, Eleventh Edition, p.180.] . The CAC does not undertake scientific evaluations per se but relies on the opinions of scientific expert Committees or Consultations convened by FAO and WHO on specific issues. These expert bodies such as the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committees on Food Additives, the Joint FAO/WHO Meetings on Pesticide Residues and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on Microbiological Risk Assessments are independent of the CAC and it subsidiary bodies and do not fall within the scope of the present Strategic Framework. The mandates, functions, composition and agendas of these bodies are established by FAO and WHO. Although the independence of the expert bodies is critical to the objectivity of their opinions, meetings of these bodies normally take into account the advice of the CAC as indicated in Article 1 of the Commission’s Statutes. There is considerable synergy between the scientific panels of FAO and WHO and the intergovernmental bodies of the CAC in order to take decisions based on scientific evidence. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES1. The fundamental objective of the Codex Alimentarius Commission is to establish sound internationally agreed guidelines for national food control systems based on the criteria of consumer health protection and fair practices in trade and taking into account the needs and special concerns of all countries. All of the objectives listed below are considered to be equally important to the overall achievement of the strategic vision. Objective 1: Promoting Sound Regulatory Framework 1.
In many countries, effective food control is undermined by the
existence of fragmented legislation, multiple jurisdictions and
weaknesses in surveillance, monitoring and enforcement. Sound
national food control and regulatory systems are essential to
assuring the health and safety of domestic population as well as
assuring the safety and quality of foods entering international
trade. While the establishment of regulatory framework is
fundamentally a national responsibility, the CAC and its parent
bodies, the FAO and WHO, have a strong interest in promoting
national regulatory systems that are based on international
principles and guidelines and address all components of the food
chain. The development of sound food control and regulatory
infrastructure including human resources is particularly important
for developing countries as they seek to achieve higher levels of
food safety and nutrition and will require high level political and
policy commitment as highlighted in the report of the 1999 Melbourne
Conference on International Food Trade Beyond 2000. [ Report of the
Conference on International Food Trade beyond 2000:Science based
Decisions, Harmonization, Equivalence and Mutual Recognition, 2. The priorities for the CAC in the development of international standards and related texts will be to: • provide essential guidance for member countries through the continued development of international standards and guidelines relating to food safety and hygiene, nutrition, labelling and import/export inspection and certification systems and for the practical application of the concepts of equivalence and mutual recognition ; and • promote the development of national food control systems based on international principles and criteria for the reduction of health risk along the entire food chain. Objective 2: Promoting Widest and Consistent Application of Scientific Principles and Risk Analysis 1. The CAC will promote and further strengthen its capacity to include health considerations in its standards and guidelines through the widest possible application of risk analysis based on Codex principles. Risk analysis as it applies to food, is an emerging discipline and will require ongoing and sustained inputs from the Commission, its parent organizations and national governments to promote conceptual development and application at the international and national levels. Risk Communication will be vital to this process. The early implementation of the CAC Action Plan on Risk Analysis by the Commission and member governments is essential to: • promoting the consistent application of risk analysis principles throughout all of the work of Codex system; • achieve strengthened international capacity for risk assessment including those related to microbiological hazards and dealing with emerging pathogens; • improving understanding of risk analysis concepts, principles and application at the national level especially for developing countries through targeted technical assistance and cooperation, • promoting greater transparency of the whole risk analysis process; • improving understanding of how precaution and scientific uncertainty are factored and taken into account in the risk analysis process; • strengthening risk communication; and • promoting the collection of data from developing countries and from all regions of the world so that the risk analysis is based on global conditions and requirements. 2. The CAC will also need to accord high priority to ongoing development of concepts and principles and the establishment of sound working principles for the application of risk analysis both at international and national levels. It should also promote better understanding of risk analysis through technical assistance programmes. A strengthened expert scientific evaluation structure for addressing chemical, microbiological hazards and emerging pathogens will also be critical to support and underpin the Codex standards development processes. 3. Consistent with the Statements of Principle, adopted by CAC in 1995, the Commission will need to have due regard, where appropriate, to other legitimate factors relevant to health protection of consumers and for the promotion of fair practices in food trade when developing standards and guidelines. International consensus on the scope and application of other legitimate factors in Codex decision making will be essential for their sound and consistent application right across the Codex system. Objective 3: Promoting Linkages/ between Codex and other Multilateral Regulatory Instruments and Conventions 1. The CAC does not and cannot operate in isolation. It needs to work closely with other relevant international standards setting and regulatory bodies to promote close cooperation and dialogue on matters of common interest. As the WTO-recognized international body for establishing food safety standards the Commission has a clear obligation to establish international food standards for the protection of consumers’ health and ensuring fair practices in food trade, and these standards may be used by Member countries in both domestic regulation and international trade. At the same time the Commission needs to interact closely with related international bodies. and take due account of international regulatory initiatives and developments thereby promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and nongovernmental organizations. Such cooperation is also important to minimize duplication of effort. Food safety and issues such as biotechnology are of global interest and are the subjects of debate and discussion in a number of multilateral institutions. The CAC has, by virtue of its lead role in international food standards, a strategic interest in working closely with relevant multilateral institutions and conventions to provide its technical input and expertise and contribute to building international consensus on contemporary food standards and regulatory policy matters. Objective 4: Enhance Capacity to Respond Effectively and Expeditiously to New Issues, Concerns and Developments in the Food Sector 1. With the rapid development of technology and emergence of food safety as a major issue of public policy, there is a need to enhance the capacity of Codex to respond to members’ needs in a way that maintains confidence in its ability as the international organization for food standards. There are a number of important considerations in this context. A major issue for Codex is the length of time it takes to establish standards. Codex processes are too protracted and are not responsive to current expectations and public policy imperatives. Governments around the world are having to grapple with significant regulatory challenges and Codex, as the global food standards setting body, needs to be able to respond effectively and expeditiously through the development of internationally harmonized solutions to food safety and international trade matters. A refocusing of the manner in which the Commission and its subsidiary bodies produce outcomes must be a strategic priority. The key functions of a refocused Commission would be to: • provide strategic oversight, direction and cross coordination of the work programmes of all subsidiary bodies; • initiate new work and adopt standards and related texts against defined time frames; • provide a forum for discussion of selected contemporary food safety and regulatory policy issues; • make appropriate use of information technologies; and • promote consensus-based decision-making. 2. At the subsidiary body level, major improvements can be achieved through the establishment of time-limited procedures and through a review of the current step procedure. Timely development of standards will also require improved alignment of the timing and frequency of meetings of commodity and general subject committees. 3. As noted in the introductory sections, the parent bodies of the Commission accord high priority to food safety and international standards development programmes. Host governments also provide significant financial support. Ultimately, however, the ability of Codex to fulfil its mandate and respond to the growing needs and expectations of its members will depend on the availability of additional resources. Codex meetings and related activities already represent a heavy workload and further intensification of work will require additional financial and human resources. Objective 5: Promoting Maximum Membership and Participation 1. Full participation by all Codex Members and other interested parties in the work of the CAC and its subsidiary bodies is now more important than ever. The participation of all members and relevant intergovernmental and non governmental organizations is critical to sound decision-making and ensuring that Codex standards and related texts take account of the full range of interest and viewpoints. Since the early nineties there has been a significant increase in the membership of Codex with developing countries now constituting a significant proportion of total membership. Notwithstanding this growth in membership many countries are still faced with serious financial and human resource constraints to effective participation in Codex activities. Achieving the objective of maximum participation will require specific and ongoing action to address the following: • Resource constraints- Early action is required to facilitate the effective participation of developing countries in Codex standards development activities, including financial assistance from extrabudgetary resources where possible; • Capacity building -There is a continuing need to invest in capacity building programmes, especially in developing countries aimed at strengthening national Codex administrative and consultative structures (e.g., Codex Contact Point and National Codex Committee) and provide for enhancing national capacity for technical analysis and participation in international standards development activities by all interest groups. This requires bilateral or multilateral technical assistance and should include training. 2. In addition to actions to promote participation of member countries, the CAC also needs to continue its efforts to promote and facilitate the participation of consumers and public interest groups in its processes at the international leveland encourage governments to take action at the national level. Given the strong public interest in food safety and regulatory issues, the involvement and input of consumers and non governmental groups at the international and national levels is essential to build public confidence in international standards and assure the strong public input, acceptance and support for Codex standards, guidelines and recommendations as a basis for domestic regulation and trade. Objective 6: Promoting Maximum Application of Codex Standards 1. As the pre-eminent international standards setting body for food, the CAC has a clear and strategic interest in promoting the maximum use of its standards both for domestic regulation and international trade. International harmonization based on Codex standards, guidelines and recommendations is essential to promoting a global approach to consumer health protection (including systems for the reduction of food-borne risks) and minimizing the negative effects of technical regulations on international trade. This will require sustained commitment and effort in the following key directions: • The Statements of Principle on the Role of Science in the Codex Decision-Making and the Extent to which Other Factors are Taken into Account [ Codex Alimentarius Commission, Procedural Manual, Eleventh Edition, p.180.] which provide the essential criteria for decision making in Codex, will require strong support and commitment by all countries if the statements are to become operationally effective both at international and national levels; • Codex must continue to promote the application of sound science and the principles of risk analysis on a consistent basis throughout its work as envisaged in the Commission’s Action Plan on Risk Analysis [ Codex Alimentarius Commission, Report of 23rd session, Rome, 28 June-3 July 1999, p.10-11.] ; • Codex processes must be inclusive and transparent and provide for participation and input from all interested groups both at the national and international level. This is particularly important given the interest and concern among Codex members to assure that Codex processes take due account of scientific uncertainties and the element of precaution. Transparency of the criteria and process of risk assessment and decision making will be paramount to achieving this objective; • The Commission must complete the strategic shift, first signaled at the 1991 FAO/WHO International Conference on Food Standards, Chemicals in Food and Food Trade, towards performance-based standards and guidelines for broad application across a range of commodities and focus on provisions essential for health protection of consumers and for the promotion of fair practices in food trade; • Codex must ensure that its standards and guidelines reflect the needs and special concerns of the developing world without compromising on the health of consumers; • Codex decisions should be based on consensus to the maximum extent possible; • The Codex Alimentarius Commission, whilst acknowledging that food safety standards cannot be compromised, should, when elaborating and deciding upon Codex standards and any related texts, take into consideration the special needs of developing countries including infrastructure, resources, technical and legal capabilities. Codex standards and related texts should not have the effect of creating unnecessary, unjustified or discriminatory obstacles to the exports of developing countries; and • Codex standards for food quality and safety, including labelling aspects, should be carefully prepared to ensure that they are not over-prescriptive and not more restrictive than necessary. Implementation of the Strategic Vision and Objectives1. The strategic objectives described in this document will require a plan of action and implementation strategy. These matters will be addressed within the framework of the Medium Term Plan for 2003-2007. |